The Rise of Algorithmic Bosses: Rethinking Workers' Rights in Nigeria's Digital Economy

Authors

  • Yetunde Braimoh-Habeebu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53704/m3kj3g72

Abstract

The digital transformation of Nigeria’s labour market has redefined traditional employment relationships, especially with the rise of gig platforms such as Uber, Bolt, and various food delivery services. At the heart of this transformation lies algorithmic management, where software, rather than human supervisors, dictates critical decisions about work assignments, pay, and performance.

This article critically examines the adequacy of Nigeria’s existing employment law framework in addressing the unique challenges posed by this form of technologically mediated labour. It contends that the current binary classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors is ill-suited to the realities of platform work, which often combines elements of both. Arguing for a more nuanced legal approach, the paper proposes a hybrid framework that introduces an intermediate status for digital workers, expands core labour protections, and ensures algorithmic transparency. Ultimately, it calls for a rethinking of employment rights that aligns with the imperatives of human dignity, fairness, and social justice in Nigeria’s evolving digital economy.

References

Bérénice Schramm, ‘Algorithmic Management in the Platform Economy: Risks and Responses’ (2022) 161 International Labour Review 67.

Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5.

Labour Act (Cap L1, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004).

International Labour Organization (ILO), Decent Work in the Platform Economy: Revisiting Worker Classifications (2022).

Bolt Nigeria, Driver Partnership Terms and Algorithmic Control Statement (2023).

National Minimum Wage Act, 2019 (Nigeria).

Fairwork Project, Oxford Internet Institute, Ratings, Rankings and Accountability: The Labour Standards of Digital Platforms in Nigeria (2023).

National Union of Professional App-Based Workers (NUPA-BW), Constitution and Activities (2021–2023).

Royal Decree-Law 9/2021 of Spain (‘Rider Law’), Ley Riders.

Valerio De Stefano, ‘Algorithmic Bosses and the Platform Economy’ (2020) Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal.

International Labour Organization (ILO), Convention No. 158: Termination of Employment Convention (1982).

T Wu and L Zhang, ‘Human vs. Algorithmic Feedback in Online Work: A Behavioural Study’ (2024) SSRN Electronic Journal.

European Commission, Proposal for a Directive on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work COM(2021) 762 final.

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), s 254C.

Ekundayo Oluwole, ‘Hybrid Worker Status in the Age of Algorithms’ (2024) African Journal of Labour Law.

UNESCO, AI Ethics Recommendations and Algorithmic Bias (2021).

International Labour Organization (ILO), Ensuring Social Dialogue in Digital Labour Platforms (2023).

India, The Code on Social Security, 2020.

California Assembly Bill No. 5 (AB5), 2019.

Proposition 22, California (2020).

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), Uber SA Drivers Case Decision, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-12